Skip to main content

THE BIG DEAL ABOUT AGILITY



Agility as a management concept was thrust into our consciousness during the early days of COVID-19. Evidently, this seemed to have come about on account of the prevailing crisis and the need for people and businesses to navigate and survive the increasingly difficult terrain.

The truth however, is that Agility has been a subject of relevance even before COVID-19. The technological and digital disruptions especially with the Artificial Intelligence conundrum were major critical factors driving Agility across business domains. Of course there are other factors such as regulatory pressures, shifting consumer behavior and the challenge of incumbents by disruptors – all vehemently contributing to the Agility quest.

Personally, I have severally lent my voice to the Agility discuss across several platforms, many of which happened in year 2019. My last speaking engagement being with the Nigerian IT Professionals in Canada held in March 2020 – just prior to the COVID-19 global lockdown. So yes, Agility has been around for a bit but what really is the fuss about Agility, and why has it taken over our business conversations and psyche these days?

First, let me clarify the concepts of AGILE and Agility. Like I once shared in a LinkedIn article and as far as the business domain is concerned, both terminologies mean different things. Today and in IT – Software Development specifically, AGILE is that term that describes a set of PRACTICES, PRINCIPLES & METHODOLOGIES that govern a whole ‘new’ way of working. Notably the need to execute projects in iterations as opposed to a less effective ‘Waterfall’ approach. The set of practices is widely popular with self-directing teams and is characterized by end-user centricity/customer focus, speed to market, quick learning and decision making cycles. Agility on the other hand, refers to a mindset and an approach to work that allows for resilience, adaptability and responsiveness within a business environment. Clearly, Agility draws largely from the mindset and values driving an AGILE culture. The idea here is with businesses, seeking to draw on the many benefits embedded in AGILE methodologies. So while it is possible to apply AGILE principles without ‘doing’ AGILE, it is impossible to ‘do’ AGILE without being efficiently adaptable.

Advertisement

Once again, why is Agility such a big deal and why are we constantly bombarded with the term at every turn? The simple answer to this is: ‘The world has changed!’ The world has evolved haven transversed four major industrial revolutions. The fourth and where we’re now situated is evidently characterized by speed and relentless change. Proponents of Agility insist that it is impossible to have the same structures that powered the previous revolutions drive the degree innovation and creativity required to thrive in the fourth industrial revolution.

Evidently COVID-19 has further heightened the need to respond to change in ways that we’re not typically inclined to. Arguably, increasingly agile organizations seemed better positioned to address business challenges while the COVID-19 lock down lasted with many actively creating and/or utilizing digital sales channels to serve customers affected by mobility restrictions. Also, quite a number of these organizations leveraged for business continuity their existing and/or established remote and flexible work arrangement for employees.

So clearly, in order to survive and thrive today, businesses will need adopt a certain kind of posture which would enable them anticipate, plan for, respond to and adapt to incremental changes and sudden disruptions.

Adopting new methodologies would of necessity impact both organizational structures and functions- that is, way beyond the IT function. To this end, more and more organizations are looking to extend Agility across the entire business hence the emerging concept – ‘Business Agility’.

Mckinsey clearly spells out the five domains for which Agility may be adopted. They are:

  1. Strategy
  2. Structure
  3. Process
  4. People
  5. Technology

For sure, analyzing each of these domains is beyond the scope of this article, however, generally speaking we find that Start-ups are more inclined to have agility built into their DNA with all of these domains being intrinsically Agile. Not so for legacy organizations. For this category, Agility need to be seen as a journey. Still, organizations in this cadre are beginning to experiment with and effecting Agile Transformations across these organizational domains.

To my mind, the people dimension to Agility is highly critical to the successes attainable with other domains. How so? Because failure to build people agility and capabilities will inadvertently slow down efforts – even render futile, energies invested in other domains. For example, seeking to deliver on a Digital Transformation agenda without a collective agile mindset driving the program will be highly counterproductive.

To sustain the drive to Agility therefore, themes and capabilities like Workforce agility, HR agility, Leadership Agility, and Learning Agility need be catered to across the entire organization.

Indeed, failure to have a well-rounded approach to driving Agility implies that an organization would struggle to read its environment, fail to respond quickly and effectively to emerging opportunities. It will also lag behind vis-a-vis identifying changing business needs. In the current industrial dispensation, and in my opinion, all of these are too great a price to pay for failing to investigate, adopt and embrace Agility.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Agile HR (3)

HR has definitely come a long way. Many  #HR  professionals have made impressive success aiding their organizations in navigating multiple disruptions. Many also have managed to keep up to speed with best practices with regards to  #practices  ,  #processes  and  #policies  . What appears to be a limiting factor though is where  #HR  has no clue as to why these practices are in place and therefore are unable to sustain such for long term benefits. For example, what is the purpose of Psychological Safety in a knowledge economy? What is the value drivable from a Servant/True Leadership model? And what is the essence of Employee Experience (EX) for employee engagement and retention? Any ideas? Please share.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RESPECT

For those who undermine the value of respect in their organizations, choosing rather to look the other way or underplay the unsavory impact of disrespect as a cultural norm, Training Industry’s PSYCHOLOGY OF LEADING WITH RESPECT survey shows that culture of disrespect within organizations resulted in: 1. Decreased Productivity 2. Lost time 3. Additional Costs. My take is that discerning leaders will do well to courageously address norms of disrespect. They will as a result save their organisations from attendant and perhaps unintended but sinister consequences. Do look out as I share my thoughts on the subject of RESPECT in the workplace for the rest of the week! But meanwhile, you can watch snippet of my presentation on IMPACT OF RESPECT & CULTURAL NORMS IN AGILE at the Women in Africa Conference (WIA) 2022. https://lnkd.in/dJk6-eZx

Feedback Postures

For a very long time and for some inexplicable reason, I believed that feedback was a fundamental human right.  So it rattled me un-end in scenarios where I expected feedback & it never came. With my line of work as trainer and facilitator, I have experienced a significant number of instances where program organizers would worry participants about session evaluations but did absolutely nothing with the information garnered much less convey to facilitators! As I grew older however, I had to let go of my beliefs around feedback. And where it really matters I would literally demand it. Over time, I have come to realize that not everyone is as vested in the idea of continuous improvement. Somewhere deep down inside though, I wish that they did care. Why? Because successful people, systems, start-ups, organizations & nations have consistently elevated the quality of value and service delivery largely because of the premium placed on harnessing feedback from service offerings ...